Three closely related 1-[(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)methyl]-4-(halobenzo-yl)piperazines: similar mol-ecular structures but different inter-molecular inter-actions

Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun. 2019 Jan 11;75(Pt 2):202-207. doi: 10.1107/S2056989019000458. eCollection 2019 Feb 1.

Abstract

In each of the compounds 1-[(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)methyl]-4-(3-fluoro-benzo-yl)piperazine, C19H19FN2O3 (I), 1-[(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)methyl]-4-(2,6-di-fluoro-benzo-yl)piperazine, C19H18F2N2O3 (II), and 1-[(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)methyl]-4-(2,4-di-chloro-benzo-yl)piperazine, C19H19Cl2N2O3 (III), the piperazine rings adopt a chair conformation with the (1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)methyl substituent occupying an equatorial site: the five-membered rings are all slightly folded across the O⋯O line leading to envelope conformations. The dihedral angle between the planar amidic fragment and the haloaryl ring is 62.97 (5)° in (I) but 77.72 (12)° and 75.50 (5)° in (II) and (III), respectively. Despite their similarity in constitution and conformation, the supra-molecular inter-actions in (I)-(III) differ: in (I), a combination of C-H⋯O and C-H⋯π(arene) hydrogen bonds links the mol-ecules into a three-dimensional framework structure, but there are no hydrogen bonds of any sort in either (II) or (III), although the structure of (III) contains a short Cl⋯Cl contact between inversion-related pairs of mol-ecules.

Keywords: crystal structure; hydrogen bonding; mol­ecular conformation; piperazines; supra­molecular assembly.

Grants and funding

This work was funded by University Grants Commission grants BSR Faculty Fellowship and Rajeev Gandhi Fellowship.