Impact of tumor size on patient survival after radical nephrectomy for pathological T3a renal cell carcinoma

Abstract

Purpose: We recently reported the results from a multi-institutional retrospective outcome study involving 814 patients with renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) who had undergone radical surgery and whose diagnoses were confirmed via a central pathological review. This study aimed to clarify the impact of tumor size on survival outcomes in patients with pT3aN0M0 RCC after radical nephrectomy using this cohort.

Methods: Using the Kaplan-Meier method, overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) were estimated for 103 pT3aN0M0 patients. The differences in the OS, CSS and RFS according to tumor size were evaluated using the log-rank test. To identify independent prognostic factors that affected each survival outcome, clinicopathological factors were examined using univariate and multivariate analyses, and the Cox proportional hazards model.

Results: The OS, CSS and RFS rates for 26 patients with pT3a RCCs ≤4 cm were significantly better than those for 77 patients with pT3a RCCs that were 4-7 cm or >7 cm (P = 0.0064, 0.0169 and 0.0001, respectively). Tumor size and venous invasion were independent prognosticators for OS, CSS and RFS. The OS and CSS for patients with pT3a tumors ≤4 cm were comparable with those for patients with pT1 RCCs, and the RFS for patients with pT3a RCCs ≤4 cm was similar to that for patients with pT1b RCCs.

Conclusions: Tumor size significantly influenced the prognosis for patients with pT3aN0M0 RCC. This study's results suggest that the postoperative management of pT3a RCCs could be individualized according to tumor size.

Keywords: pathological T3a; prognosis; renal cell carcinoma; tumor size.