Prospective study of canine leptospirosis in shelter and stray dog populations: Identification of chronic carriers and different Leptospira species infecting dogs

PLoS One. 2018 Jul 11;13(7):e0200384. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200384. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

Dogs are highly susceptible to the leptospiral infection, notably stray and sheltered dogs. Unsanitary conditions often observed in dog shelters may predispose the introduction and spread of leptospires among sheltered populations, potentially increasing the chances for the inadvertent adoption of asymptomatically infected animals. The present work describes a longitudinal study using a multidisciplinary approach for the identification of chronically infected dogs and the characterization of potentially pathogenic strains circulating among stray and sheltered dog populations in São Paulo, Brazil. A total of 123 dogs from three populations were included. The initial evaluation consisted of blood and urine quantitative PCR testing (qPCR), the detection of specific antibodies by microscopic agglutination test (MAT), physical examination and hematological and serum biochemistry analyses. The qPCR-positive dogs were prospectively examined, and reevaluations also included culture from urine samples. Positive qPCR samples were subjected to 16S rRNA and secY gene phylogenetic analysis. The recovered strains were characterized by Multilocus Sequence Typing, polyclonal serogroup identification and virulence determination. Leptospiruria was detected in all populations studied (13/123), and phylogenetic analysis revealed that 10 dogs had L. interrogans infection. Three dogs (3/13) had L. santarosai infection. The secY phylogenetic analysis revealed that the L. santarosai sequences clustered separately from those obtained from other hosts. Ten leptospiruric dogs were reevaluated, and three dogs presented persistent leptospiruria, allowing culturing from two dogs. The strains were characterized as L. interrogans serogroup Canicola (virulent) and L. santarosai serogroup Sejroe (not virulent). Serum samples were retested by MAT using the DU92 and DU114 strains as antigens, and no increased seroreactivity was detected. Asymptomatic L. santarosai infection was observed in all populations studied, suggesting a possible role of dogs in the chain of transmission of this leptospiral species. The results suggest a genetic distinction between lineages of Brazilian L. santarosai maintained by dogs and other animal hosts. Our findings revealed that dogs could act as maintenance hosts for distinct pathogenic Leptospira, highlighting also that asymptomatically infected dogs can be inadvertently admitted and adopted in dog shelters, potentially increasing the risks of zoonotic transmission.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Antibodies, Bacterial / blood
  • Bacterial Proteins / blood
  • Bacterial Proteins / genetics
  • Bacterial Proteins / urine
  • Brazil
  • Chronic Disease
  • Cities
  • Dog Diseases / epidemiology*
  • Dog Diseases / microbiology*
  • Dogs
  • Female
  • Leptospira / genetics
  • Leptospira / isolation & purification
  • Leptospirosis / epidemiology
  • Leptospirosis / microbiology
  • Leptospirosis / veterinary*
  • Male
  • Phylogeny
  • Prospective Studies
  • RNA, Ribosomal, 16S / blood
  • RNA, Ribosomal, 16S / urine

Substances

  • Antibodies, Bacterial
  • Bacterial Proteins
  • RNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Grants and funding

This study was supported by the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP; http://www.fapesp.br/ - Grant Number 2012/14681-7); B.A.M. was recipient of the PhD fellowship from FAPESP and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq; http://cnpq.br/) (grant numbers 2012/13022-0 and 164284/2014); A.G.A.G. was recipient of the PhD fellowship from Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES; http://www.capes.gov.br - Grant number 12/111); L.Z.M. was recipient of the PhD fellowship from FAPESP (2013/17136-2); A.M.M., M.K.H., M.B.H., R.A.D. and P.E.B. are CNPq research fellows. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.