Appropriateness of Dabigatran and Rivaroxaban Prescribing in Qatar: A 5-Year Experience

J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Mar;23(2):155-161. doi: 10.1177/1074248417731536. Epub 2017 Oct 4.

Abstract

Introduction: Over the past few years, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been gradually replacing warfarin. Inappropriate prescribing of DOACs in real-life practice settings can affect their perceived safety and efficacy, especially with the lack of a surrogate marker for guidance.

Objectives: To describe the appropriateness of DOACs prescribing, compare dabigatran to rivaroxaban in terms of inappropriate prescribing, and determine other factors associated with inappropriate DOACs use.

Methods: In this cross-sectional retrospective study, 5-year DOAC prescriptions data were extracted. Appropriateness was evaluated based on approved dosing and indications in Canada and the United States. Descriptive and inferential statistics were performed using SPSS.

Results: From 2011 to 2015, there were 1049 DOACs prescriptions, among which 572 (54.5%) were for dabigatran and 477(45.5%) were for rivaroxaban. The DOACs were prescribed for inappropriate indication in 35 (3.3%) patients, while inappropriate dosing was found in 352 (33.6%) prescriptions. There were significantly more inappropriate dabigatran prescriptions compared to rivaroxaban both in terms of indication (4.7% vs 1.7%, P = .004) and dosing (50.9% vs 12.8%, P < .001). Logistic regression analysis confirmed that dabigatran prescribing was the only factor associated with inappropriate indications (odds ratio [OR] = 2.9, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3-6.5). Factors associated with inappropriate dosing included dabigatran prescriptions (OR = 7.6, 95% CI: 5.5-10.5) and poor renal function (OR = 14.6, 95% CI: 3.6-58.4).

Conclusion: Direct oral anticoagulants have been gradually replacing warfarin in Qatar; however, they are not always prescribed appropriately especially in patients on dabigatran and those with renal impairment. Educating health-care practitioners is necessary. Future studies comparing the clinical safety and effectiveness of the DOACs especially when used at an inappropriate dose are also warranted.

Keywords: appropriateness; dabigatran; direct oral anticoagulants; rivaroxaban.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Administration, Oral
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Antithrombins / administration & dosage*
  • Antithrombins / adverse effects
  • Clinical Decision-Making
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Dabigatran / administration & dosage*
  • Dabigatran / adverse effects
  • Drug Prescriptions
  • Drug Utilization Review
  • Factor Xa Inhibitors / administration & dosage*
  • Factor Xa Inhibitors / adverse effects
  • Female
  • Guideline Adherence
  • Humans
  • Inappropriate Prescribing*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic
  • Practice Patterns, Physicians'*
  • Qatar
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Factors
  • Rivaroxaban / administration & dosage*
  • Rivaroxaban / adverse effects
  • Time Factors

Substances

  • Antithrombins
  • Factor Xa Inhibitors
  • Rivaroxaban
  • Dabigatran