Where is the client/patient voice in interprofessional healthcare team assessments? Findings from a one-day forum

J Interprof Care. 2017 Jan;31(1):122-124. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2016.1233393. Epub 2016 Dec 5.

Abstract

There is a growing interest in interprofessional care (IPC) as a way to provide better healthcare. However, it is difficult to evaluate this mode of healthcare delivery because identifying the appropriate measurement tool is a challenge, given the wide diversity in team composition and settings. Adding to this complexity is a key gap in the IPC evaluation research: the client/patient perspective. This perspective has generally not been included in the development of IPC healthcare team evaluations. The authors received a Canadian Institute for Health Research Planning Grant to host a one-day forum with 24 participants from across Canada representing health professions such as social work, medicine, occupational therapy, and physical therapy, in addition to researchers, client/patient advocates, and hospital administrators. The overarching goal of the forum was to create a demonstration project that supports the development of an IPC assessment tool for healthcare teams that includes clients/patients. Using a concept mapping methodology, participants discussed client/patient inclusion in IPC assessments, and through a consensus process, chose a demonstration project for further development.

Keywords: Client/patient; concept mapping; interprofessional collaboration; team assessment.

MeSH terms

  • Cooperative Behavior
  • Group Processes
  • Health Personnel / psychology
  • Hospital Administrators / psychology
  • Humans
  • Interprofessional Relations*
  • Patient Care Team / standards*
  • Patients / psychology
  • Quality Indicators, Health Care*
  • Research Design
  • Research Personnel / psychology
  • Social Workers / psychology