Errors in the scoring and reporting of cognitive screening instruments administered in primary care

Neurodegener Dis Manag. 2016 Aug;6(4):271-6. doi: 10.2217/nmt-2016-0004. Epub 2016 Jul 13.

Abstract

Aim: To measure the frequency of scoring and reporting errors in cognitive screening instruments administered in the primary care setting in consecutive referrals to a dedicated secondary care memory clinic.

Methods: Using a simple ad hoc classification, referral letters from primary care mentioning cognitive screening instrument use were classified as: unequivocal, incorrect/ambiguous or incomplete.

Results: Overall, reported test scores were either ambiguous/incorrect or incomplete in 23% of cases, with higher individual frequencies for two screening instruments recommended for use in primary care, the Six-item Cognitive Impairment Test (26%) and the General Practitioner Assessment of Cognition (32%).

Conclusion: Errors are not infrequent in the scoring and reporting of cognitive screening instruments administered in primary care. More training in their correct use and scoring is required.

Keywords: dementia; diagnosis; primary care; scoring errors; screening.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Cognition Disorders / diagnosis*
  • Cognition Disorders / epidemiology
  • Dementia / diagnosis*
  • Dementia / epidemiology
  • England
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Memory Disorders / diagnosis*
  • Memory Disorders / epidemiology
  • Middle Aged
  • Neuropsychological Tests*
  • Primary Health Care*
  • Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
  • Referral and Consultation
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Young Adult