Genomic sequencing of a dyslexia susceptibility haplotype encompassing ROBO1

Satu Massinen; Jingwen Wang; Krista Laivuori; Andrea Bieder; Isabel Tapia Paez; Hong Jiao; Juha Kere

doi:10.1186/s11689-016-9136-y

Genomic sequencing of a dyslexia susceptibility haplotype encompassing ROBO1

J Neurodev Disord. 2016 Jan 27:8:4. doi: 10.1186/s11689-016-9136-y. eCollection 2016.

Authors

Satu Massinen¹, Jingwen Wang², Krista Laivuori¹, Andrea Bieder², Isabel Tapia Paez², Hong Jiao², Juha Kere³

Affiliations

¹ Molecular Neurology Research Program, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland ; Folkhälsan Institute of Genetics, Biomedicum Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
² Department of Biosciences and Nutrition, and Science for Life Laboratory, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
³ Molecular Neurology Research Program, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland ; Folkhälsan Institute of Genetics, Biomedicum Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland ; Department of Biosciences and Nutrition, and Science for Life Laboratory, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Abstract

Background: The DYX5 locus for developmental dyslexia was mapped to chromosome 3 by linkage study of a large Finnish family, and later, roundabout guidance receptor 1 (ROBO1) was implicated as a candidate gene at DYX5 with suppressed expression from the segregating rare haplotype. A functional magnetoencephalographic study of several family members revealed abnormal auditory processing of interaural interaction, supporting a defect in midline crossing of auditory pathways. In the current study, we have characterized genetic variation in the broad ROBO1 gene region in the DYX5-linked family, aiming to identify variants that would increase our understanding of the altered expression of ROBO1.

Methods: We have used a whole genome sequencing strategy on a pooled sample of 19 individuals in combination with two individually sequenced genomes. The discovered genetic variants were annotated and filtered. Subsequently, the most interesting variants were functionally tested using relevant methods, including electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA), luciferase assay, and gene knockdown by lentiviral small hairpin RNA (shRNA) in lymphoblasts.

Results: We found one novel intronic single nucleotide variant (SNV) and three novel intergenic SNVs in the broad region of ROBO1 that were specific to the dyslexia susceptibility haplotype. Functional testing by EMSA did not support the binding of transcription factors to three of the SNVs, but one of the SNVs was bound by the LIM homeobox 2 (LHX2) protein, with increased binding affinity for the non-reference allele. Knockdown of LHX2 in lymphoblast cell lines extracted from subjects from the DYX5-linked family showed decreasing expression of ROBO1, supporting the idea that LHX2 regulates ROBO1 also in human.

Conclusions: The discovered variants may explain the segregation of dyslexia in this family, but the effect appears subtle in the experimental settings. Their impact on the developing human brain remains suggestive based on the association and subtle experimental support.

Keywords: Dyslexia; ROBO1; Whole genome sequencing.