Evaluation of phenotypic and molecular methods for identification of Streptococcus pneumoniae

Future Microbiol. 2016;11(1):43-50. doi: 10.2217/fmb.15.124. Epub 2015 Dec 17.

Abstract

Aim: The objective of this study is to compare various Streptococcus pneumoniae identification methods.

Materials & methods: In total, 1371 putative S. pneumoniae isolates were tested with three phenotypic methods and a molecular-based method targeting a virulence factor (CpsA). We assessed the sensitivity and the specificity of each method and widely used S. pneumoniae identification algorithm.

Results: None of the methods or the identification algorithm used separately was able to correctly identify all S. pneumoniae isolates. Furthermore, a high rate of optochin resistance was found.

Conclusions: We demonstrated the failure of the current S. pneumoniae identification methods and optochin susceptibility-based algorithm. In addition, the high rate of optochin resistance might justify the necessity of a close monitoring of optochin susceptibility.

Keywords: PCR; Streptococcus pneumoniae; bile solubility; colony morphology; identification; optochin.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / metabolism
  • Bacterial Proteins / genetics
  • Bacteriological Techniques / methods*
  • Bacteriolysis / drug effects
  • Bile / metabolism
  • Europe
  • Humans
  • Molecular Diagnostic Techniques / methods*
  • Nasal Mucosa / microbiology
  • Pneumococcal Infections / diagnosis
  • Pneumococcal Infections / microbiology
  • Quinine / analogs & derivatives
  • Quinine / metabolism
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Streptococcus pneumoniae / classification*
  • Streptococcus pneumoniae / genetics
  • Streptococcus pneumoniae / isolation & purification*
  • Streptococcus pneumoniae / physiology

Substances

  • Anti-Bacterial Agents
  • Bacterial Proteins
  • CpsA protein, Streptococcus pneumoniae
  • ethylhydrocupreine
  • Quinine