Computed Tomography Observer Agreement in Staging Malignant Lymphoma

J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2016 Mar-Apr;40(2):261-5. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000338.

Abstract

Objective: To determine pretreatment computed tomography observer agreement in patients with newly diagnosed lymphoma.

Methods: Forty-nine computed tomography scans were reviewed by 3 experienced radiologists, with each scan assessed twice by 1 observer. Predefined nodal and extranodal regions were assessed, and Ann Arbor stages were assigned. K-statistics were defined as poor (κ < 0.2), fair (κ > 0.2 to κ ≤ 0.4), moderate (κ > 0.4 to κ ≤ 0.6), substantial (κ > 0.6 to κ ≤ 0.8), and almost perfect (κ > 0.8 to κ ≤ 1).

Results: Nodal interobserver agreement varied from 0.09 for infraclavicular involvement to 0.95 for para-iliac involvement; intraobserver agreement was substantial to almost perfect, except for infraclavicular nodes. Extranodal interobserver agreement varied from 0.56 to 0.88; intraobserver agreement was substantial to almost perfect. Ann Arbor stage interobserver agreement varied from 0.57 to 0.69; intraobserver agreement was substantial.

Conclusion: Computed tomography observer agreement in staging malignant lymphoma appears to be suboptimal.

Publication types

  • Multicenter Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Child
  • Cohort Studies
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Lymph Nodes / diagnostic imaging
  • Lymph Nodes / pathology
  • Lymphoma / diagnostic imaging*
  • Lymphoma / pathology*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Observer Variation
  • Prospective Studies
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed*
  • Young Adult