Introduction: Oral targeted therapies are a new option for lung cancer treatment. However, patient's belief about these drugs - which may interact with adherence - is poorly known in this setting.
Method: Our study is a pilot prospective unicentric study. Inclusion criteria were: to have been diagnosed with a lung cancer; and to be prescribed with an oral targeted therapy in second line or more. The main objective was to assess patient's specific (SB) and general beliefs (GB) about these drugs according to the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ). The declared adherence was assessed with the Morisky's test. All included patients underwent a semi-structured interview with a psychologist.
Results: Fifthteen patients were included: 12 underwent erlotinib treatment and 3 a crizotinib treatment. The mean score (±standard deviation) at BMQ was 54/85 (±6) overall; 34/50 (±5) for specific belief and 19/35 (±3) for general belief about drugs. During interview, 47% believed in efficacy of targeted oral therapy; 93% reported concerns about their drug; 80% considered that the information given by the physician about the drug was comprehensive; but 40% still required additional information about it. The mean score at Morisky's test was 3/4 (±2) and 53% reported to have forgotten at least once their antineoplastic drug. No correlation was found between belief and adherence.
Conclusion: Belief about t anti-cancer targeted oral therapy is relatively fair but adherence is moderate in this pilot study. Interview shows the need for additional information about the prescribed drug.
Keywords: Adherence; Belief; Cancer broncho-pulmonaire; Croyance; Inhibiteur des tyrosine-kinases (ITK); Lung cancer; Observance; Tyrosine kinase inhibitors.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.