Evaluation of the accuracy of aorta scan BVI 9600 in screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm

Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014 Aug;48(2):147-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.04.030. Epub 2014 Jun 2.

Abstract

Objectives: Despite a decreasing incidence of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), the cost-effectiveness of AAA ultrasound screening can be improved by reducing the screening costs and increasing the uptake rates. The BVI 9600 (BVI) is a promising tool for this purpose as it is inexpensive and can detect AAA without a trained operator. This study aims to investigate whether the BVI can be used to detect AAA for the purpose of a low-cost outreach screening approach.

Methods: A total of 142 subjects had their abdominal aortae measured by five sonographers using the BVI and a conventional ultrasound machine. The examination included four anterior-posterior measurements at four equally spaced scanning locations from the xiphisternum to the umbilicus. The measurements produced by each machine were compared using Bland-Altman plots, followed by an analysis of the AAA detection performance.

Results: The BVI measured the aortic diameter to within 0.88-1.56 cm of the true diameter, exceeding the 0.5 cm "clinically acceptable difference" (CAD). Its accuracy was poorer when measuring the aneurysmal aortae (mean difference -0.56 cm, variability 1.72 cm) than normal aortae (mean difference 0.02 cm, variability 0.76 cm). Nine out of 52 aneurysms were not detected due to undersizing measurement and non-visualization of the aortae.

Conclusions: At present, the BVI is not sufficiently accurate to detect AAA for screening purposes. A number of technical features require improvement.

Keywords: Aortic aneurysm; Screening; Ultrasound.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Evaluation Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aorta, Abdominal / diagnostic imaging*
  • Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal / diagnostic imaging*
  • Dilatation, Pathologic
  • Equipment Design
  • Humans
  • Observer Variation
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Ultrasonography