Correlation between histologic and radiographic reconstruction of intracochlear electrode position in human temporal bones

Audiol Neurootol. 2014;19(3):184-92. doi: 10.1159/000358003. Epub 2014 Mar 27.

Abstract

In our laboratory, human temporal bone specimens from patients who in life have undergone cochlear implantation are routinely processed with the implant in situ, embedded in Araldite, sectioned at 20 µm and serially photographed during cutting, stained with toluidine blue and mounted on glass slides. From the images, two-dimensional and three-dimensional reconstructions can be made and a very accurate implant insertion depth can be calculated from the three-dimensional reconstructions. However, this method precludes subsequent special stains and further molecular investigations of the tissue including proteomics and immunostaining, which is now possible with celloidin-embedded tissue. In this study, we correlated measurement of the implant array insertion depth calculated from histologic three-dimensional reconstruction with that measured from three-dimensional radiologic multiplanar reconstruction. Four human temporal bones with cochlear implants underwent postfixation preprocessing CT imaging with a Siemens Somatom Sensation Scanner. The CT scans from these four bones were downloaded into the Voxar software application, reformatted using the multiplanar reconstruction tool, viewed in three dimensions and measurements of intracochlear insertion lengths of the implants were obtained. The bones were processed routinely for in situ Araldite embedding, serial images were made of the block during sectioning, postprocessed using PV-Wave® software, aligned with Amira® software, and used to create histologic three-dimensional reconstructions. From these three-dimensional reconstructions, the insertion depth of the electrode array was mathematically calculated. The range of insertion depths was 15.9 mm (case 1) to 26.6 mm (case 4). The two methods, radiographic multiplanar reconstruction and three-dimensional reconstruction, differed by 0.4-0.9%. This provides confidence that important localization information about the electrode in situ can be gleaned from CT scans, thereby allowing us to extract the implants prior to processing for celloidin embedment and allow further techniques such as special stains and immunostaining to be accomplished in order to evaluate molecular mechanisms involved in cochlear implantation.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

MeSH terms

  • Cochlear Implantation*
  • Cochlear Implants*
  • Deafness / diagnostic imaging
  • Deafness / pathology
  • Deafness / surgery*
  • Humans
  • Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
  • Radiography
  • Temporal Bone / diagnostic imaging
  • Temporal Bone / pathology
  • Temporal Bone / surgery*