Abstract
Value-based insurance design (VBID) plans selectively lower cost sharing to increase medication adherence. Existing plans have been structured in a variety of ways, and these variations could influence the effectiveness of VBID plans. We evaluated seventy-six plans introduced by a large pharmacy benefit manager during 2007-10. We found that after we adjusted for the other features and baseline trends, VBID plans that were more generous, targeted high-risk patients, offered wellness programs, did not offer disease management programs, and made the benefit available only for medication ordered by mail had a significantly greater impact on adherence than plans without these features. The effects were as large as 4-5 percentage points. These findings can provide guidance for the structure of future VBID plans.
Keywords:
Evidence-Based Medicine; Health Spending; Organization and Delivery of Care; Pharmaceuticals; Quality Of Care.
Publication types
-
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
MeSH terms
-
Case Management / economics
-
Case Management / statistics & numerical data
-
Chronic Disease / economics*
-
Chronic Disease / therapy*
-
Cohort Studies
-
Cost Sharing / economics
-
Cost Sharing / statistics & numerical data
-
Cost-Benefit Analysis / economics
-
Cost-Benefit Analysis / statistics & numerical data
-
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 / drug therapy
-
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 / economics
-
Drug Costs / statistics & numerical data
-
Evidence-Based Medicine
-
Female
-
Healthcare Disparities / economics
-
Healthcare Disparities / statistics & numerical data
-
Humans
-
Hypertension / drug therapy
-
Hypertension / economics
-
Insurance Coverage / economics*
-
Insurance Coverage / statistics & numerical data*
-
Insurance, Pharmaceutical Services / economics*
-
Insurance, Pharmaceutical Services / statistics & numerical data*
-
Male
-
Medication Adherence / statistics & numerical data*
-
Middle Aged
-
United States
-
Value-Based Purchasing / economics*
-
Value-Based Purchasing / statistics & numerical data*