Analysis of risk factors for recurrence after curative resection of well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors based on the new grading classification

Abstract

Background: It is difficult to predict the malignant potential of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) precisely. This study investigated the validity of a new grading system adopted by the World Health Organization 2010 classification to determine risk factors for recurrence of PNETs.

Methods: Data of 70 patients with PNETs who underwent curative resection were retrospectively examined by uni- and multivariate analyses. Histopathological findings were re-reviewed by experienced pathologists. NET G1 was defined as mitotic count <2 per 10 high power fields (HPF) and/or ≤2% Ki67 index, and NET G2 as 2-20 mitosis per 10 HPF and/or 3-20% Ki67 index.

Results: There were 58 patients with NET G1 and 12 with NET G2. Incidence of recurrence was 11.4%. Univariate analysis demonstrated significant risk factors for recurrence including NET G2 of histological grade (P = 0.0089), male gender (P = 0.0333), tumor size ≥ 20 mm (P = 0.0117), lymph node metastasis (P = 0.0004), liver metastasis (P < 0.0001), lymphatic invasion (P = 0.046), and neural invasion (P = 0.0002). By multivariate analysis, histological grade (hazard ratio; 59.76, P = 0.0022) and neural invasion (hazard ratio; 147.49, P = 0.0016) were significantly associated with recurrence of PNETs.

Conclusions: This study confirmed the prognostic relevance of the new grading classification and that evaluation of perineural invasion and histological grade should be considered as prognostic predictors in well-differentiated PNETs (NET G1 and G2).

Keywords: Grading classification; Neural invasion; Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor; Predictors of recurrence; WHO 2010 classification.