The importance of pollinator generalization and abundance for the reproductive success of a generalist plant

PLoS One. 2013 Oct 7;8(10):e75482. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075482. eCollection 2013.

Abstract

Previous studies have examined separately how pollinator generalization and abundance influence plant reproductive success, but none so far has evaluated simultaneously the relative importance of these pollinator attributes. Here we evaluated the extent to which pollinator generalization and abundance influence plant reproductive success per visit and at the population level on a generalist plant, Opuntia sulphurea (Cactaceae). We used field experiments and path analysis to evaluate whether the per-visit effect is determined by the pollinator's degree of generalization, and whether the population level effect (pollinator impact) is determined by the pollinator's degree of generalization and abundance. Based on the models we tested, we concluded that the per-visit effect of a pollinator on plant reproduction was not determined by the pollinators' degree of generalization, while the population-level impact of a pollinator on plant reproduction was mainly determined by the pollinators' degree of generalization. Thus, generalist pollinators have the greatest species impact on pollination and reproductive success of O. sulphurea. According to our analysis this greatest impact of generalist pollinators may be partly explained by pollinator abundance. However, as abundance does not suffice as an explanation of pollinator impact, we suggest that vagility, need for resource consumption, and energetic efficiency of generalist pollinators may also contribute to determine a pollinator's impact on plant reproduction.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Diptera
  • Ecosystem*
  • Hymenoptera
  • Opuntia / physiology*
  • Pollen*
  • Pollination / physiology*
  • Reproduction / physiology

Grants and funding

Funding came from CONICET (Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas) (PIP 6564 and 2781), Fondo para la Investigación Científica y Tecnológica (PICT 20805, 1471 and 2010–2779) and BBVA Foundation (“BBVA is the official name of the foundation funded by BBVA bank, and there is no full name for it”)(BIOCON03-162). M.B. Maldonado was supported by an undergraduate fellowship from the Universidad Nacional de Cuyo, and S.B. Lomáscolo by a CONICET(Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas) post-doctoral fellowship. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.