Should furosemide be avoided in acute right ventricular myocardial infarction?

Abstract

Background: Diuretics are conventionally prohibited in acute right ventricular myocardial infarction.

Aims: To assess the benefit of diuretics compared to fluid expansion in patients with inferior myocardial infarction extended to the right ventricule.

Methods: Of 295 patients admitted for inferior or posterior acute myocardial infarction between November 2008 and November 2010, 77 had a right ventricular extension. Among these 77 patients, 19 presented with oligoanuria (<0.5 mL/kg per hour) and no criteria for cardiogenic shock. Overall, 11 patients were treated by low dose of furosemide (40 to 80 mg) and eight received fluid expansion using isotonic saline solution.

Results: Baseline right ventricular dilatation and dysfunction, systolic blood pressure and heart rate were similar between the groups. Twenty-four hours after treatment, urine output was similar between the two groups but only the patients in the diuretic group improved their blood pressure (103 ± 16 mmHg versus 127 ± 20 mmHg, P < 0.001), heart rate (71 ± 15 bpm versus 76 ± 13 bpm, P = 0.03), creatinin level and alanine aminotrasferase plasmatic level. Hospitalization duration and the need of inotropic support were similar in the two groups.

Conclusions: Diuretics and fluid expansion provide similar efficiency for triggering diuresis in patients with right ventricular infarction and oligoanuria but only diuretics seem to be associated with improvement in hemodynamic status and venous congestion.