[Comparison of the rate of maternal complications of nifedipine and nicardipine in cases of preterm labor: historical study on two consecutive periods]

J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2012 Nov;41(7):631-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2012.04.020. Epub 2012 Jul 6.
[Article in French]

Abstract

Objectives: Calcium channel blockers are the most frequently used tocolytics as first-line in France, frequently intravenously (nicardipine [Loxen(®)]). We would like to compare the side effects of intravenous nicardipine and oral nifedipine.

Materials and methods: We performed a restrospective study on two consecutive periods. On the first period (March 2007-September 2008), 110 patients received intravenous nicardipine for preterm labor, and 67 patients received oral nifedipine on the second period (October 2008-January 2010). Side effects were recorded.

Results: Patients in the nicardipine-treated group had significantly more side effects (31% versus 16% for nifedipine group, P=0.03). No-administration way related adverse events did not differ between the two groups (P=0.1). There was more low blood pressure in patients treated with nifedipine (P=0.03), but shorter hospital stay (5.4 days versus 7.9 days with nicardipine, P=0.05).

Conclusion: Using nifedipine simplifies tocolysis administration, and decreases hospital stays without increasing the risk of prematurity.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • English Abstract

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Calcium Channel Blockers / adverse effects*
  • Female
  • France
  • Humans
  • Nicardipine / administration & dosage
  • Nicardipine / adverse effects*
  • Nifedipine / administration & dosage
  • Nifedipine / adverse effects*
  • Obstetric Labor, Premature / drug therapy*
  • Pregnancy
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Tocolytic Agents / adverse effects*

Substances

  • Calcium Channel Blockers
  • Tocolytic Agents
  • Nicardipine
  • Nifedipine