Background: In many clinical situations, stool examinations for ova and parasites (O&P) are routine in the work-up of patients with acute or chronic diarrhea. Frequently, these tests are found to be negative for pathogens. The purpose of this study was to examine the diagnostic yield of routine stool testing for O&P in a Canadian tertiary care centre and to estimate the potential clinical benefit of a positive result.
Patients and methods: All stool samples sent to the central microbiology laboratory at London Health Sciences Centre were reviewed over a 5-year period ending January 2010. Initial screening was done by direct antigen testing using an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) technique followed by direct microscopy for negative results where there was a high index of suspicion and for positive results to rule out any concurrent parasites not included in the EIA kit. Pathogens identified were categorized and their potential susceptibility to metronidazole was estimated. No clinical data were available, as this was purely a utilization study.
Results: A total of 5812 stool tests were ordered. Of these, 5681 (97.7%) were completed. The most common reasons for an incomplete test were sample leakage (n = 38) and use of the incorrect collection kit (n = 32). Direct microscopy identified white blood cells in 17% of patients with positive testing. The most common pathogen was Giardia lamblia , which was detected in 45/83 (54%) of positive specimens. Entamoeba histolytica/Entamoeba dispar was identified in 16/83 (19%) and Cryptosporidium spp. in 10/83 (12%) of positive specimens. Microorganisms not thought to be pathogenic were identified in 7/83 (8%). Direct laboratory costs independent of labor were estimated at $1836 per clinically significant organism identified. Of the 77 specimens positive for pathogenic organisms, 62 (81%) were likely to be sensitive to treatment with metronidazole.
Conclusion: In a tertiary care centre, the diagnostic yield of routine testing of stool for O&P during the evaluation of patients with acute or chronic diarrhea is low. Most clinically significant positive results should be responsive to metronidazole, but empirical treatment is not encouraged. Strategies to identify patients with a higher likelihood of harboring pathogenic parasites and consideration of empiric metronidazole therapy for patients at highest risk merit further research.