Four-dimensional flow-sensitive MRI of the thoracic aorta: 12- versus 32-channel coil arrays

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012 Jan;35(1):190-5. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22633. Epub 2011 Oct 11.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the performance of four-dimensional (4D) flow-sensitive MRI in the thoracic aorta using 12- and 32-channel coils and parallel imaging.

Materials and methods: 4D flow-sensitive MRI was performed in the thoracic aorta of 11 healthy volunteers at 3 Tesla (T) using different coils and parallel imaging (GRAPPA) accelerations (R): (i) 12-channel coil, R = 2; (ii) 12-channel coil, R = 3; (iii) 32-channel coil, R = 3. The quantitative analysis included SNR, residual velocity divergence and length and curvature of traces (streamlines and pathlines) as used for 3D flow visualization. In addition, semi-quantitative image grading was performed to assess quality of phase-contrast angiography and 3D flow visualization.

Results: Parallel imaging with an acceleration factor R = 3 allowed to save 19.5 ± 5% measurement time compared with R = 2 (14.2 ± 2.4 min). Acquisition using 12 channels with R = 2 and 32 channels with R = 3 produced data with significantly (P < 0.05) higher quality compared with 12 channels and R = 3. There was no significant difference between 12 channels with R = 2 and 32 channels with R = 3 but for the depiction of supra-aortic branches where the 32-channel coil proved superior.

Conclusion: Using 32-channel coils is beneficial for 4D flow-sensitive MRI of the thoracic aorta and can allow for a reduction of total scan time while maintaining overall image quality.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Algorithms
  • Aorta, Thoracic / pathology*
  • Blood Flow Velocity
  • Cardiovascular System / pathology
  • Humans
  • Image Processing, Computer-Assisted / methods
  • Imaging, Three-Dimensional / methods*
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging / methods*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Models, Statistical
  • Reproducibility of Results