Two hospitals with 1 trauma system: a joint approach to the care of the injured patient

Am J Surg. 2012 Apr;203(4):454-60. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.04.006. Epub 2011 Sep 9.

Abstract

Background: Trauma centers are closing at an alarming rate, but the need for trauma care persists. This article shows the sustainability and feasibility of a joint trauma system whereby 2 university-affiliated hospitals function as a single trauma center system in a moderate-sized city.

Methods: Since 1994, 3 days per week, trauma patients are transported by emergency medical services (EMS) to hospital A. The other 4 days they are transported to hospital B. Trauma registry data from 1994 to 2008 were analyzed. Cost data were also examined.

Results: The joint system admitted 28,338 trauma patients. On each center's nontrauma days, trauma team activation was required infrequently. The 2 centers share costs; they perform joint outreach, educational training, and quality control. The joint trauma system has been sustained since 1994.

Conclusions: Two hospitals functioning as a single trauma center system is a viable model of care for injured patients in a moderate-sized city with mostly blunt trauma.

MeSH terms

  • Academic Medical Centers / organization & administration
  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Cost Savings*
  • Feasibility Studies
  • Female
  • Hospital Mortality / trends*
  • Hospitals, University / organization & administration*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Multiple Trauma / diagnosis
  • Multiple Trauma / mortality
  • Multiple Trauma / therapy
  • Organizational Innovation
  • Outcome Assessment, Health Care*
  • Registries
  • Risk Assessment
  • Survival Rate
  • Trauma Centers / organization & administration*
  • United States
  • Wounds and Injuries / diagnosis
  • Wounds and Injuries / mortality
  • Wounds and Injuries / therapy
  • Wounds, Nonpenetrating / diagnosis
  • Wounds, Nonpenetrating / mortality
  • Wounds, Nonpenetrating / therapy
  • Young Adult