Background: Use of biological agents has been shown to be an efficacious approach in psoriasis, when traditional treatments fail. However, there are limited data on the effectiveness and safety of switching from one biological agent to another.
Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of etanercept as a sequential treatment in patients previously treated with efalizumab, and to evaluate different transition strategies from efalizumab to etanercept.
Methods: We present a retrospective study in patients with high-need plaque psoriasis who were unable to continue efalizumab and were immediately switched to etanercept.
Results: We included 35 patients during a 4.5-year period. At 24 weeks of etanercept therapy, 57% of patients had a PASI reduction of 75%, suggesting that alternating between biological agents is feasible. We used three different switching approaches: (i) etanercept in combination with cyclosporine as bridge therapy, (ii) etanercept in combination with methotrexate as bridge therapy, (iii) etanercept monotherapy. Combination therapy was efficacious in all patients, including eight patients with rebound phenomenon with efalizumab. Etanercept was discontinued in two patients as a result of serious adverse events that consisted of an oral squamous cell carcinoma and a diffuse B-cell-non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
Conclusions: In our experience, it seems that etanercept alone may not be sufficient when transitioning from efalizumab in high-need patients with severe worsening or rebound of psoriasis. In such patients, combination of etanercept with cyclosporine or methotrexate is a more effective approach. Non-response to efalizumab did not preclude clinical response after switching to etanercept.
© 2010 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2010 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.