A cost-utility analysis of antenatal screening to prevent congenital rubella syndrome

Epidemiol Infect. 2010 Aug;138(8):1172-84. doi: 10.1017/S0950268809991336. Epub 2009 Dec 17.

Abstract

In low vaccination coverage regions (LVR) in The Netherlands people often reject participation in the National Immunization Programme for religious reasons. During a rubella epidemic in 2004-2005, 32 pregnant women were notified with rubella, and 11 babies were born with defects related to maternal infection. This study presents a cost-utility analysis of a screening and vaccination programme for rubella focusing on three scenarios: (1) screening non-vaccinated pregnant women in LVR; (2) screening all pregnant women in LVR; (3) screening all non-vaccinated pregnant women in The Netherlands (including pregnant first-generation non-Western immigrant women). Cost-utility was estimated over a 16-year period which included two rubella outbreaks. Observed complications from the 2004-2005 epidemic were used to estimate average cost savings and quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) gained. The programme would be cost-effective (euro1100/QALY gained) when assuming an acceptability of vaccination of 20% in women belonging to orthodox protestant risk groups.

MeSH terms

  • Child, Preschool
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Disease Outbreaks / economics
  • Disease Outbreaks / prevention & control
  • Disease Outbreaks / statistics & numerical data
  • Female
  • Geography
  • Humans
  • Infant
  • Infant, Newborn
  • Mass Screening / economics
  • Mass Screening / statistics & numerical data
  • Mass Vaccination / economics*
  • Mass Vaccination / statistics & numerical data
  • Pregnancy
  • Prenatal Diagnosis / economics*
  • Quality-Adjusted Life Years
  • Rubella Syndrome, Congenital / economics*
  • Rubella Syndrome, Congenital / epidemiology
  • Rubella Syndrome, Congenital / prevention & control
  • Rubella Vaccine

Substances

  • Rubella Vaccine