Human papillomavirus vaccination: what is the best choice? A comparison of 16 strategies by means of a decisional model

Epidemiol Infect. 2009 Jun;137(6):794-802. doi: 10.1017/S0950268808001441. Epub 2008 Oct 17.

Abstract

Some European countries decided to include human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines in national immunization schedules. In order to help decision makers choose the best vaccination policy for females, a decisional model has been developed. The study was performed from the National Health Service perspective. Several hypotheses of multi-cohort vaccination policies were compared. 'Potentially avoidable infections' were chosen as the outcome. The model envisioned a short-term scenario (2008-2011). The best policy was that of vaccinating 12-year-olds and, a year later, those aged 14-16 years; the most expensive strategy was that of vaccinating 12-year-old females and, after 1 year, vaccinating those aged 15, 18 and 25 years. The sensitivity analysis showed that coverage rate has a great effect on the cost of avoidable infections. The study offers stake-holders an important datum-point for the choice of the best HPV policy vaccination in the short term. Indeed, it could generate interesting savings for the National Health Service and a rapid HPV immunization of young girls.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Age Distribution
  • Child
  • Decision Making*
  • Decision Trees
  • Drug Administration Schedule
  • Female
  • Health Policy / economics
  • Humans
  • Models, Theoretical
  • Papillomavirus Vaccines / administration & dosage*
  • Papillomavirus Vaccines / immunology*
  • Vaccination / economics
  • Vaccination / methods*

Substances

  • Papillomavirus Vaccines