Background and aims: A previous thrombotic event and advanced age are well-known risk factors for thrombosis in essential thrombocythemia (ET). In these patients, therefore, cytotoxic drugs are needed to reduce platelet count. In spite of this convincing idea, in clinical practice, some old patients do not use platelet-reducing drugs, for a variety of causes, and few specific studies in old patients with ET are available. Our retrospective study reports single-center experience in 54 old ET patients with long follow-ups.
Methods: We compared the clinical outcome of 27 ET old patients not taking cytotoxic drugs (group A) with 27 cases treated with hydroxyurea (HU) (group B), evaluating the incidence of thrombosis and thrombosis-free survival. In 16 patients in group A and in 18 in group B, V617FJak2 mutation was sought. About 20% of HU-treated patients developed major side-effects.
Results: No significant difference was found in the occurred thrombosis between the 2 groups in either clinical or laboratory features. V617FJak2 was equally common in groups A and B, and in patients with or without thrombosis.
Conclusions: This study is not randomised and includes a small number of patients. However, it shows that it is necessary to identify better patients who really need treatment, as the side-effects of HU are relatively common in old people and their treatment should be discontinued. V617FJak2 does not define the thrombotic risk in old ET patients.