Efficacy and safety of an extended-release formulation of desloratadine and pseudoephedrine vs the individual components in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis

Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2005 Mar;94(3):348-54. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60986-6.

Abstract

Background: Antihistamine-decongestant combination products generally provide more benefit than individual components for adequately treating patients who have seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) with moderate-to-severe nasal congestion.

Objective: To compare the effectiveness and safety of a 24-hour, extended-release formulation of desloratadine and pseudoephedrine with the individual components in patients who have SAR with moderate-to-severe nasal congestion.

Methods: Patients with SAR and significant nasal congestion were enrolled in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy study. Patients were randomly assigned for 2 weeks to once-daily treatment with desloratadine-pseudoephedrine, 5/240-mg tablets; desloratadine, 5 mg; or pseudoephedrine, 240 mg. Primary efficacy variables for the antihistamine and decongestant components of desloratadine-pseudoephedrine were morning and evening reflective total symptom score (TSS), excluding nasal congestion, and morning and evening reflective nasal congestion score during the 2-week treatment period, respectively. Secondary variables included morning instantaneous (end-of-interval) TSS (excluding congestion), nasal congestion score, reflective morning and evening individual symptom scores, overall condition of SAR, and therapeutic response.

Results: A total of 1121 patients were enrolled in the study, and 1047 patients completed the 2-week study. Desloratadine-pseudoephedrine was significantly more effective than desloratadine or pseudoephedrine monotherapy in reducing morning and evening reflective TSS (excluding nasal congestion) during the entire treatment period. Desloratadine-pseudoephedrine also was significantly more effective in reducing the morning and evening reflective nasal congestion score compared with desloratadine or pseudoephedrine monotherapy. Significant differences were seen between the desloratadine-pseudoephedrine and monotherapy groups for changes in morning instantaneous TSS (excluding nasal congestion) and nasal congestion scores. No unusual or unexpected adverse events were reported.

Conclusion: Desloratadine-pseudoephedrine, 5/240-mg once-daily tablets, provided additional benefit over desloratadine, 5 mg, or sustained-release pseudoephedrine, 240 mg, monotherapy in the treatment of patients with SAR and moderate-to-severe nasal congestion.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Child
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Drug Combinations
  • Ephedrine / administration & dosage*
  • Female
  • Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating / administration & dosage*
  • Humans
  • Loratadine / administration & dosage*
  • Loratadine / analogs & derivatives*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Nasal Decongestants / administration & dosage*
  • Nasal Obstruction / drug therapy*
  • Nasal Obstruction / etiology
  • Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal / complications
  • Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal / drug therapy*
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Drug Combinations
  • Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating
  • Nasal Decongestants
  • Loratadine
  • desloratadine
  • Ephedrine