Laparoscopic gastric bypass versus laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in the super-obese: a comparative study of 290 patients

Obes Surg. 2005 Jan;15(1):76-81. doi: 10.1381/0960892052993486.

Abstract

Background: Controversy exists regarding the best surgical treatment for super-obesity (BMI >50 kg/m2). The two most common bariatric procedures performed worldwide are laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP). We undertook a retrospective single-center study to compare the safety and efficacy of these two operations in super-obese patients.

Methods: 290 super-obese patients underwent laparoscopic bariatric surgery: 179 LAGB and 111 LRYGBP.

Results: There were one death in both groups. The early complication rate was higher in the LAGB group (10% vs 2.8%, P<0.01). Late complication rate was higher in the LAGB group (26% vs 15.3%, P<0.05). Operating time and hospital stay were significantly higher in the LRYGBP group. LRYGBP had significantly better excess weight loss than LAGB (63% vs 41% at 1 year, and 73% vs 46% at 2 years), as well as lower BMI than LAGB (35 vs 41 at 18 months).

Conclusion: LRYGBP results in significantly greater weight loss than LAGB in super-obese patients, but is associated with a higher early complication rate.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Body Mass Index
  • Cohort Studies
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • France
  • Gastric Bypass / adverse effects
  • Gastric Bypass / methods*
  • Gastroplasty / adverse effects
  • Gastroplasty / methods*
  • Humans
  • Laparoscopy / methods*
  • Laparoscopy / mortality
  • Length of Stay
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Obesity, Morbid / diagnosis*
  • Obesity, Morbid / mortality
  • Obesity, Morbid / surgery*
  • Pain, Postoperative / physiopathology
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Survival Rate
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Weight Loss