VAD or VMBCP in severe multiple myeloma. The Groupe d'Etudes et de Recherche sur le Myélome (GERM)

Br J Haematol. 1992 Feb;80(2):199-204. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1992.tb08901.x.

Abstract

A randomized trial has been performed in which 91 patients with stage III myeloma and additional severe criteria were randomly allocated to either VAD or VMBCP. No significant difference was noted between these two groups using the following criteria: response rate (VMBCP: 54%; VAD: 39%), impact on symptoms, median survival (VMBCP: 14 months, VAD: 17 months). However, toxic effects and refusal to pursue treatment were more frequent with VAD than with VMBCP (12 v 6). Therefore, in this trial, VMBCP appears to be more useful than VAD.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / adverse effects
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / therapeutic use*
  • Carmustine / administration & dosage
  • Cyclophosphamide / administration & dosage
  • Dexamethasone / administration & dosage
  • Dexamethasone / adverse effects
  • Doxorubicin / administration & dosage
  • Doxorubicin / adverse effects
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Melphalan / administration & dosage
  • Middle Aged
  • Multiple Myeloma / drug therapy*
  • Multiple Myeloma / mortality
  • Prednisone / administration & dosage
  • Prognosis
  • Vincristine / administration & dosage
  • Vincristine / adverse effects

Substances

  • Vincristine
  • Dexamethasone
  • Doxorubicin
  • Cyclophosphamide
  • Melphalan
  • Carmustine
  • Prednisone

Supplementary concepts

  • M-2 protocol
  • VAD I protocol