Evaluation of amantadine in chronic hepatitis C: a meta-analysis

J Hepatol. 2004 Sep;41(3):462-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2004.05.019.

Abstract

Background/aims: The benefit of amantadine combination therapy, either with interferon (IFN) alone (double therapy) or with ribavirin and IFN (triple therapy) is unknown.

Methods: We analyzed the effect of amantadine on the end-of-treatment virological response and the sustained response using meta-analysis of 31 randomized controlled trials.

Results: Overall analysis revealed a significant effect of amantadine. Triple therapy was the best regimen for improving the sustained response (mean difference: 8.4%, 95% CI: 2.4-13.8%, P=0.002). In subgroup analysis, amantadine did not have a significant effect upon naive patients or relapsers. In non-responders, combination therapy with amantadine was associated with a significant effect on the sustained response (mean difference: 8.3%, 95% CI: 1.9-14.6%, P=0.01). In sensitivity analysis, double therapy did not improve virological responses. Conversely, triple therapy tended to improve the end-of-treatment virological response and was associated with a significant effect upon the sustained response (mean difference: 12.7%, 95% CI: 3.8-21.6%, P=0.005).

Conclusions: Combination therapy with amantadine is of no effect upon naive patients or relapsers. In non-responders, triple therapy with amantadine improved the sustained response. New randomized controlled trials are required to confirm this meta-analysis.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis

MeSH terms

  • Amantadine / administration & dosage
  • Amantadine / therapeutic use*
  • Antiviral Agents / administration & dosage
  • Antiviral Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Hepatitis C, Chronic / drug therapy*
  • Humans
  • Interferon Type I / administration & dosage
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Recombinant Proteins
  • Ribavirin / administration & dosage

Substances

  • Antiviral Agents
  • Interferon Type I
  • Recombinant Proteins
  • Ribavirin
  • Amantadine