Who makes good use of memory aids? Results of a survey of people with acquired brain injury

J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2003 Sep;9(6):925-35. doi: 10.1017/S1355617703960127.

Abstract

Wilson and Watson (1996) identified several factors that were associated with use of memory aids and strategies in a group of people with acquired brain injury. The present study tested these findings, with the aim of identifying the variables that best predict effective use of memory aids after brain injury. One-hundred and one people with memory problems arising from brain injury and their carers were interviewed to identify the aids/strategies used to compensate for memory impairment, and the efficacy of their use. Information relating to variables previously found, or hypothesized to predict use of memory aids, was collected. Use of memory aids correlated with level of independence. External aids such as calendars, wall charts, and notebooks were the most commonly used memory aids. Electronic organizers were not used by many participants. The variables that best predicted use of memory aids were (1) current age, (2) time since injury, (3) number of aids used premorbidly, and (4) a measure of attentional functioning. The implications for rehabilitation services are discussed.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aging
  • Attention
  • Brain Injuries / physiopathology*
  • Brain Injuries / rehabilitation
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Interviews as Topic
  • Male
  • Memory Disorders / etiology*
  • Memory Disorders / rehabilitation
  • Middle Aged
  • Neuropsychological Tests
  • Patient Participation*
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Self-Help Devices*
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Time Factors