Background: Thawing of cryopreserved mobilized peripheral blood (MPB) is routinely performed for autologous and allogeneic MPB transplantation. Usually thawing is achieved by submerging the cell bag in a waterbath (37 degrees C temperature). We compared the effectiveness of thawing cryopreserved MPB in a waterbath with an electric dry-warming device containing warmed gel pads (Sahara, Transmed).
Methods: Two cryopreserved bags from each of 31 apheresis procedures were thawed in a waterbath and under dry conditions in parallel. Viability (dye exclusion), apoptosis/necrosis (annexin/propidiumiodide staining) and clonogenic potential (CFU-E plus BFU-E, CFU-GM) of the cells were tested after thawing.
Results: Statistical analysis by Wilcoxon matched-pair test showed no significant difference between the thawing procedures in terms of the in vitro parameters tested.
Discussion: Our results indicate that thawing of cryopreserved MPB using dry warming and water bath give similar viability, apoptosis/necrosis rate and clonogenic potential. Both procedures take about the same amount of time and are easy to perform. Nevertheless, the potentially decreased risk of bacterial contamination of either the cell product or the patient room, and guidelines of good clinical practice (GCP), favor the use of the dry warming procedure.