The cost-effectiveness of clozapine: a controlled, population-based, mirror-image study

J Psychopharmacol. 2002 Jun;16(2):169-75. doi: 10.1177/026988110201600208.

Abstract

A retrospective cohort study, with a mirror-image design, was used to measure inpatient service utilization in 63 consecutive patients started on clozapine from a geographical catchment area compared to a control group matched for previous inpatient service use. An intent-to-treat analysis, including those patients (n = 28) who discontinued clozapine during the study period, showed a significant reduction in number of admissions and total time spent in hospital in the 2 years following clozapine initiation compared to the previous 2 years and to the follow-up period in the control group. This translated into a reduction of 7,300 pounds in hospitalization costs per patient started on clozapine, over the 2-year period. In those patients who continued clozapine treatment for the whole of the 2-year period, there was a two-thirds reduction in number of admissions and total time spent in hospital compared to no change in the clozapine discontinuers. These findings suggest that clozapine is a clinically and cost-effective intervention for severe schizophrenia in routine clinical settings.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Antipsychotic Agents / economics*
  • Antipsychotic Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Clozapine / economics*
  • Clozapine / therapeutic use*
  • Cohort Studies
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • England
  • Female
  • Health Personnel / economics
  • Hospitalization / economics
  • Humans
  • Length of Stay / economics
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Schizophrenia / drug therapy*
  • Schizophrenia / economics*

Substances

  • Antipsychotic Agents
  • Clozapine